Candid Cross

Interviews, checked live.
210articles
0sources cited
15photographs
Reading answers

Spotting the Rehearsed Answer

Launch library · evergreen read

Photo: Studio Wing, Paul Schweiker House and Studio, Meacham Road, Schaumburg, IL - 54210243556 by w_lemay (CC BY-SA 2.0), via Openverse

A rehearsed answer tends to arrive too smoothly: consistent phrasing, a practised cadence, little of the searching or self-correction that spontaneous speech usually contains. None of this makes the content false, but it does mean the interviewer is hearing a prepared version rather than a fresh one.

Recognising rehearsal is not a reason for suspicion on its own. Many subjects have simply told a particular story many times before and have every right to a polished account of their own experience. The interviewer's task is to decide whether the polished version is sufficient, or worth probing further.

A gentle way past a rehearsed answer is to ask for a detail that the polished version would not usually include: a specific sensation, an object in the room, a smaller moment adjacent to the main story. These smaller questions tend to break the practised rhythm and return something less scripted. A little variation is usually enough to bring something newer into view.

Back to the library

Share

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.

Printed from Candid Cross. Sources for this article are listed at the end of the page.