Candid Cross

Interviews, checked live.
210articles
0sources cited
15photographs
Ethics of the chair

Rapport Without Manipulation

Launch library · evergreen read

Photo: STEP studio pict1 by Autobahn Two (CC BY-SA 3.0), via Openverse

Building genuine warmth and trust with a subject makes for a better interview, but that same warmth can be deliberately exploited to draw out material a subject would not have shared with a more neutral, less trusted questioner, and the line between the two is worth watching carefully.

Ethical rapport building aims at genuine connection, offered honestly rather than as a calculated technique deployed purely to lower a subject's guard. The distinction is partly about intent: whether warmth is felt sincerely or performed strategically to extract something specific. That distinction can be hard to judge from the outside, though the interviewer usually knows it privately.

A useful test is whether the interviewer would still treat the subject with the same warmth after the recording stops. Rapport that vanishes the instant the material has been obtained was likely never genuine to begin with. Warmth that survives beyond the recording is the clearest evidence that it was never simply a tool.

Back to the library

Share

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.

Printed from Candid Cross. Sources for this article are listed at the end of the page.