Candid Cross

Interviews, checked live.
210articles
0sources cited
15photographs
Ethics of the chair

Consent and the Right to Decline

Launch library · evergreen read

Photo: Studio Wing, Paul Schweiker House and Studio, Meacham Road, Schaumburg, IL by w_lemay (CC BY-SA 2.0), via Openverse

An interview is a voluntary exchange, and that voluntary quality is easy to erode without anyone quite intending it: through social pressure, through a sense of obligation, through simply not wanting to disappoint someone who has already set up the recording equipment and travelled to be there.

Genuine consent means a subject understands roughly what they are agreeing to, how the material will be used, and that declining any particular question carries no penalty. Establishing this clearly at the start of a sitting, rather than assuming it, protects both the subject and the eventual credibility of the material.

Consent is also not a single decision made once at the door. A subject can withdraw it partway through, and an ethical interviewer treats that withdrawal as a legitimate outcome rather than a problem to be managed or talked past. Treating that withdrawal with genuine respect, rather than resistance, is part of what makes consent meaningful in the first place.

Back to the library

Share

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.

Printed from Candid Cross. Sources for this article are listed at the end of the page.